Tuesday

Physical Versus Virtual Data Backup: Which One is Better?

A revelation Cisco made showed that 94% of compute instances and workloads would be processed in the cloud before this year ended. This information means that businesses seeking to invest in digital infrastructures will do so when datacenter organization and remote access are changing swiftly.
Cisco also disclosed that cloud backup was the way forward for storing and restoring data. Therefore, enterprises can choose between physical and virtual data backup in the cloud.

But how do these two options differ? What advantages does each have over the other to make you choose it?
Physical Versus Virtual Data Backup: Which One is Better?: eAskme
Physical Versus Virtual Data Backup: Which One is Better?: eAskme
Other people are reading: How to Reduce Server Response Time?
When is it ideal to use physical servers or virtual ones?
This post answers all these questions.
Eventually, you will be smarter and wiser to make an informed decision that meets your changing storage needs.
Therefore, keep reading to learn more about Microsoft Office 365 backup and other backup alternatives.

Image Backup

First, these two systems differ in image backup. When using virtual servers, you can take images and hasten the backup process.
You can use snapshots to store and reload a virtual server when the image was captured instead of waiting to reinstall applications and download the data to the system.
Moreover, this virtual option is more efficient and organized compared to its physical counterpart. It reduces downtime and simplifies recovery processes.
Lastly, the virtual option also helps a business to enhance retention and integration because of streamlined processes.

Portability and Independence

Independence and portability also differentiate these two backup methods.
For example, using VMware’s vMotion lets virtual computers migrate from one server to another with zero downtime to end-users.
However, physical servers don’t offer this flexibility.

Energy Efficiency

Energy efficiency is another difference between these two data backup platforms.
For instance, if you use VMware, it has a feature that lets you slash your power consumption.
It consolidates virtual machines on fewer physical servers during low resource consumption on virtual ecosystems.
The system turns off every server you don’t need.

Restoring from Failed Machines

Unlike their physical alternatives, virtual servers allow you to restore virtual machines from one failed server to another to let you rerun it immediately.
This feature is available on VMware.

Infrastructure Balancing

Those using VMware can enjoy greater ecosystem balancing in matters regarding resource consumption.
This capability separates virtual from physical machines.

Data Recovery Ease

The ease of recovering data also distinguishes virtual backup systems from physical ones. The reason is that virtual servers are independent of hardware.
For instance, if a physical server fails during backup, you can run your already backed up virtual machines on other servers since guest operating systems aren’t tied up to given hardware.

Backup Storage Capacity

This feature also separates physical backup servers from virtual ones.
When dealing with physical servers, you don’t run into duplication. The reason is that these systems use deduplication to avoid identical backups.
Inversely, virtual servers can’t or don’t detect duplicate objects during backup.
Therefore, they end up backing up duplicate objects. However, experts are still working overnight to fix this limitation in virtual backup servers.
So, we hope that with time, virtual servers will catch up with their physical counterparts to serve users better.

Granular Recovery

Granular recovery also distinguishes these two technologies. Physical servers have granular restoration capabilities.
However, virtual ones use snapshot technology to make virtual machine images.
This option is ideal for backup execution when you need to restore or clone entire virtual machines.
However, it’s not suitable for executing granular restoration processes.

So, which of the two backup platforms is better than the other?
The truth is that we can’t give a straight answer to favor one over the other. Just as our contrast and comparison have shown, we can only say that they differ from and complement each other.
Therefore, none is better than the other; instead, both can better your backup processes.
We can answer our primary question by saying that you need both of them along the way as complements.
You are free to use your discretion to implement them based on your individual business needs. Therefore, a hybrid approach is the best option, especially for a small business enterprise.

Don’t forget to share it with your friends and family.

Why?

Because, Sharing is Caring!

Don't forget to like us FB and join the eAskme newsletter to stay tuned with us.

Other Marketing Guides for you;
Grow Instagram Audience